Sections of Website: Questions * Definitions * Sample Items * Populations *
Social Profile ã
2007
Individual and Group
Assessment of Social and Activity Participation – for Clinical and Educational
Settings
QUESTIONS ©
What is your group’s participation profile?
Does your group interact at several levels? (See 5 Levels)
What combination of these levels is your group’s usual level of function?
Does your group's level of participation change with various activities?
Are you trying to measure or improve your group’s level of participation?
Would you like information about the Social Profile?
Would you like to participate in a study of your group’s level of function?

This website and all its contents are Copyright © 2007.
Mary V. Donohue, PhD, OT, FAOTA
All rights reserved.
Webmaster: MVD1@nyu.edu
Social Profile ©
DEFINITIONS OF FIVE LEVELS OF SOCIAL
PARTICIPATION:
Parallel Participation: The
members of the group play, move, or work side by side, but do not interact with
each other.
Associative Participation: The
members of the group approach each other briefly in verbal and non-verbal
interactions during play, activity, or work.
Basic Cooperative Participation:
The members of the group jointly select,
implement and execute longer play, activity or work tasks for reasons of mutual
self-interest in the goal, project or fellow members.
Supportive Cooperative Participation: The members of the group are homogeneous, and aim to fulfill
their needs of mutual emotional satisfaction, with the goals of play, activity
or work viewed as secondary. Feelings
are frequently expressed.
Mature Participation: The members of the group are heterogeneous, taking turns in a variety of complimentary roles in order to achieve the goals of the activity harmoniously and efficiently.
Sample Items
Parallel Items: The solitary activities provide little participation with group members.
Members interact very little with other people.
Associative Items: The activities include engagement in brief interaction.
There is enjoyment of activities between group members.
Basic Cooperative: Members begin to express ideas and try to meet the needs of others.
Members respect others' rights and follow group rules.
Supportive Cooperative: The activties focus on attempts to satisfy other's emotional needs by words or by actions.
Members select the activities.
Mature Group Items: The activities provide balance between emotional and performance needs of members.
The activities usually provide high level of performance, discussion or product.

POPULATIONS
Groups of varying compositions, cultures, business, political, religious, sports, and social organizations may be assessed using the Social Profile (2007). Because its levels span developmental group interaction skill abilities from 18 months, through childhood, adolescence, and adulthood, groups of all ages can be assessed using the Profile. While children typically exhibit age appropriate behaviors at progressive levels, adults may interact using any group level skills, depending on the activity's dimensions. For example, adults in exercise, movement, work or dance groups exhibit Parallel behaviors.
The Social Profile will enable you to evaluate:
1) The level of group iparticipation skill in a single session
2) The highest group behavioral skills and range of skills achieved by a group
3) The over-all profile of group participation levels across a number of
sessions
(Donohue, 2007)

FIVE LEVELS OF SOCIAL PARTICIPATION
1. Parallel level: The ability to participate in a parallel group consists of the capacity to be in an aggregate
of individuals who are working or playing in the presence of others with minimal sharing of tasks and with some
mutual stimulation. The members show some awareness of others, and a minimal verbal or nonverbal interaction
with each other.
2. Associative level: The ability to approach others for brief verbal interactions and to work or play with others
with minimal interaction. Members show ability to manifest some beginnings of cooperation and competition,
with the task as being paramount. There is minimal interaction outside the task.
Members demonstrate the
ability to engage in short term tasks, and that to receive help from others they must give help to others.
3. Basic cooperative level: The ability to select, implement and execute longer tasks through joint interaction.
Individual response within the group is based on enlightened self-interest. The members of the group
understand that their rights and needs will be acknowledged through respect and recognition of the rights of
others. Members can identify group norms and goals. The group experiments with some membership roles.
The members perceive themselves as having a right to belong to the group.
4. Supportive cooperative level: The members of this group share emotions and experiences in order to satisfy
psychosocial needs to problem-solve and grow in personal and interpersonal insight. They are homogeneous
which meets the needs of mutual satisfaction to the extent that the task is often considered to be secondary to
the fulfillment of needs. Members consist of compatible participants who relate to each other with comradery
and cooperation.
5. Mature level: The members of this group are heterogeneous participants whose various roles interact in a
complementary manner. The members are flexible enough to take on a variety of roles. They are comfortable
with higher and lower level group skill positions. The members balance task accomplishment and members
socio-emotional needs. The members take turns teaching and learning, parenting, mentoring and experimenting
with new skills and roles. ( Mosey, 1986; Donohue, 1999)
RESEARCH
Currently research is being carried out at the Department of Psychiatry, Division of Occupational Therapy,
Beth Israel Medical Center, on two psychiatric units, in New York Metropolitan area pre-schools and in
senior centers examining the interrater reliability of the Social Profile (Donohue, 2007). Reports on these
studies are referred to below or will be provided at this site when the studies are completed.
References
Donohue, M. V. Manuscript for Chapter: Evaluation of social participation. In Jacobs, K. & Sladyk, K. Occupational therapy:
Evidence and competency based practice. Slack, 2008.
Donohue, M. V. (2007) Social Profile: Interrater reliability in psychiatric and community activity groups. Australian
Occupational Therapy Journal, 54,
49-58.
Donohue,
M. V. (2005). Social Profile: Assessment of validity and reliability in
children’s groups
Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 62,
164-175.
Donohue, M. V. & Greer, E. (2004). Designing group activities to meet individual and group goals. In J. Hinojosa & M. L. Blount,
(Eds.) The texture of life. Purposeful activities in occupational therapy, (pp. 226-261). Bethesda, M.D.: AOTA Press.
Donohue, M. V. (2003). Group Profile studies with children: Validity measures and item analysis. Occupational Therapy in Mental
Health, 19, 1-23. .
Donohue, M. V. (2001). Group co-leadership by occupational therapy students in community centers: Transitional learning.
Occupational Therapy in Health Care, 15, 85-98.
Donohue, M. (1999). Theoretical bases of Mosey's group interaction skills. Occupational Therapy International, 6, (1), 35-51.
Donohue, M. V. (1996). Designing activities for a women's identification group. In R.Cottrell (Ed). Purposeful activity: Foundation
and future of occupational therapy.
Bethesda: MD: American
Occupational Therapy Association.
TRAINING
Training for using the Social Profile (2007) is necessary to provide reliability of assessment of group interaction
skills. Training can consist of:
1) Viewing videotapes/DVD's of groups of various participation levels
2) Discussing observations with a partner, colleague or supervisor
3) Using worksheets to identify videotape/DVD's of behaviors
4) Reviewing case studies of groups for their level of participation
5) Exploratory observations of groups jointly with an experienced Social Profile rater for interrater reliability
COMMUNICATION EXCHANGE
What is your interest in levels of social activity participation?
What other information would you like?
Do you have any suggestions?
E-mail: MaryVDonohue@att.net Or mvd1@nyu.edu